The Keith Vaz Westminster fan club: Why do they protect this man
An extraordinary event took place in Parliament last night only hours after Amber Rudd, the home secretary, made the really bad decision to turn down an inquiry or independent panel into the " battle of Orgreave " in the 1984 Miners' Strike.
Andrew Bridgen, Conservative MP for Leicestershire North West, moved a rare motion objecting to the appointment of :Labour MP, Keith Vaz, to the Commons Justice select committee.
Keith Vaz, the MP for Leicester, East stood down as chair of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee after an exposure in the Sunday Mirror, that he was involved in sex with two male prostitutes while posing as a " washing machine salesman" in a flat he owned in North London. Police are at present assessing whether Mr Vaz committed any offences as a result of the scandal.
Mr Bridgen's main point was that he should not stand for the post - because he himself had ruled out standing a home affairs committee chairman.
During his speech, Mr Bridgen told the Speaker Mr Bercow: "You have often spoken that this place must reflect the society with which we make the laws and I agree with you.
"I respectfully point out to the House that in any other sphere of activity a candidate with so much hanging unresolved over him would be very unlikely to be considered for such an important office.
"I believe and if (Mr Vaz) was in his place today I'd ask him to stand down from his nomination, but he's not."So I'd ask this House to reject his appointment otherwise I think we cannot blame the Great British public for having a low opinion of its politician and its politics - we can only blame ourselves."
Earlier he had been warned by Mr Bercow to " desist" after he also referred -under Parliamentary privilege- to a current historical child sex investigation said to be being conducted by Leicestershire Police where four people had come forward alleging child sexual abuse crimes.
However the view of Vaz's supportive MPs was that it was perfectly proper for him to be a member of the justice committee -despite the recent scandal. And it was Tory MPs and ministers that came forward in droves to support the Labour MP. Labour MPs were remarkable in their absence - though a number of MPs who have raised child sexual abuse cases did vote for him - notably Simon Danczuk and Tom Watson.
But it was the Tory Cabinet that stood out in support of him. They included Amber Rudd, the home secretary, who decided that there has been no " miscarriage of justice in Orgreave" and was obviously happy to think that Mr Vaz had committed no offence.
Other key supporters included Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, Liam Fox, the International Secretary; James Brokenshire, the Northern Ireland Secretary and former home office minister: David Gauke, chief secretary to the Treasury;Andrea Leadsom, the environment secretary,and Karen Bradley, the culture secretary, who is advised by Craig Woodhouse, a former Sun journalist and David Lidington, leader of the House.
Only seven MPs supported Mr Bridgen's motion. They were Nicholas Soames; Jake Berry, Conservative MP for Rossendale and Darwen; James Duddridge, Conservative MP for Rochford and Southend East; Philip Hollobone, Conservative MP for Kettering; Scott Mann, Conservative MP for North Cornwall;Matthew Offord, Conservative MP for Hendon; and Mr Bridgen himself.
On these occasions Parliament seems to resemble more a members' club than a body representing the nation. And it does itself no good. I have a feeling that the loyalty of MPs to Mr Vaz's rehabilitation plan will be misplaced and a large swathe of the Cabinet might regret their hasty decision to follow their whips advice. Parliament should not be used to play games or it will fall even more into disrespect.