Beta
Crowdfunded Journalism

The 60 year old shame of Home Office treatment of sexually and physically abused child migrants

David Hencke photo
David HenckeLondon
The 60 year old shame of Home Office treatment of  sexually and physically abused child migrants
Next month the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse will hear about Britain's shameful record on sending British children to Australian, Canadian and then Southern Rhodesian children's homes knowing that in the case of Australia, they would be physically and sexually abused.

Next month the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse will hold a hearing into how British children were shipped abroad to Australia, Canada and Southern Rhodesia ( now Zimbabwe) where they were subject to appalling physical and sexual abuse.

One of the people who has submitted evidence to the British inquiry has already raised issues about his treatment at one of these homes, Fairbridge Farm School,New South Wales in Australia.

David Hill was interviewed by the Guardian last year in Australia and tells a horrific story of a place where people were poorly educated and fed,brutally treated and some sexually abused. He went out with his brother in 1959 from Eastbourne in Sussex.

He has been one of the people who eventually prospered becoming chairman and managing director of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. ABC carried a report on his decision to send evidence here.

But his most damaging evidence is that he might not have gone there if the Home Office had acted on information they received three years earlier after a visit of UK MPs to Australia. In 1956 they came on a fact finding mission to find out about conditions in those schools.

The result, according to evidence submitted to the inquiry. is that the Home Office were given the names ( see above in a memo) of ten schools that should have been put on a blacklist and no British children should have been sent there.

But the Home Office appeared to do nothing even though they decided that the schools would need a " complete metamorphosis " to be fit to accept children. So they appear to have ignored the findings so they could keep the migrant programme going - where British children from poor backgrounds were offered a new chance in life.

 Their decision was no better than when a whistleblower, Lucy Cole Hamilton, alerted the Home Office over a decade earlier about conditions at Fairbridge Farm and warned them not to send British children there. As a report by Sanchia Berg for the Today programme revealed in 2009 the decision was to "lay by " and do nothing.  

I am hoping that this callous attitude - which seems extended today by the Home Office and Theresa May's view that we should all but ignore the plight of immigrant children seeking asylum in the UK - is thoroughly examined by the inquiry.

The inquiry's own research report points out the whole area is remarkably under investigated.As it states no inquiry has ever undertaken a proper and sustained analysis of the failings of this huge programme and properly investigated whether some of the children were sexually abused by people in institutions before they were sent abroad.

Gordon Brown has apologised in 2009 about the way the children were treated. But it was enormous programme - some 150,000 children participated and it began in the early 17C when children were sent to Virginia - though some of the largest programmes were after the second world war. It did not stop until the 1970s.

A lot of questions need to be answered - not least from the one posed by David Hill about the role of the Home Office in the late 1950s.

#Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, #Australia, #child migrants, #physical abuse, #cover up, #home office

0
0
0