Crowdfunded Journalism

Facebook to challenge paedophile's right to privacy and excessive damages in Northern Ireland test case

David Hencke photo
David HenckeLondon
Facebook to challenge paedophile's right to privacy and excessive damages in Northern Ireland test case
A case which led to a paedophile winning £20,000 damages for harassment and the banning of Facebook page by a campaigner is to be challenged in the Northern Ireland courts next week by Facebook.

An extraordinary judgement which I reported last year banning a Facebook page about a convicted paedophile and awarding him £20,000 damages for harassment is to be challenged in the courts next week.

Facebook is challenging this decision in the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal claiming the damages awarded to the sex offender were excessive and he could not reasonably expect privacy following his conviction for offences in the courts.

The case arose after Joseph McCloskey set up a Facebook profile page called ” Keep Our Kids Safe from Predators 2 ” which posted information about a convicted sex offender called CG.

None of the information published by McCloskey was private. It was all in the public domain at the time of CG’s conviction. CG’s solicitors complained to Mr McCloskey who immediately removed all postings relating to CG.

The posts are said to contain threats of violence against the paedophile which judge took particular exception.

But the lawyers weren’t satisfied and went to court claiming the sex offender had been harassed on Facebook and his human rights breached by the publication on Facebook.

The judge found against the campaigner and Facebook and awarded the sex offender £20,000 damages for harassment.

Facebook is now challenging this judgement. There is an excellent report on the Inforrm blog by trainee barrister Aiden Wills which goes into the legal details of Facebook's challenge.

Facebook is particularly challenging the judge's ruling that it should have had detailed knowledge and awareness of what Mr McCloskey wrote -pointing out that such a ruling would mean they would have to have detailed knowledge of every article put up on a Facebook site and whether it could be considered illegal. The case promises to be an interesting one.

#Facebook, #paedophiles, #harassment, #privacy

0
0
0