Crowdfunded Journalism

CHILD TRAFFICKING LAWSUIT AGAINST ISRAEL REVEALED

Marianne Azizi photo
Marianne AziziIsrael
CHILD TRAFFICKING LAWSUIT AGAINST ISRAEL REVEALED
The following is the full lawsuit made against US organisations in Israel, Israeli judges and the Minister of Welfare by Marygold Collins, mother of twins. She has been fighting for 2 years for the return of her children from private institutions. Shocking revelations.

MARYGOLD COLLINS,

vs.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Plaintiffs,

X

LYNN SCHUSTERMAN, WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL

ZIONIST ORGANIZATION, S.O.S. CHILDREN'S

VILLAGE-USA, INC., YITHAK AMIT, TOVA PERI,

GALIT MOR VIGOTSKI, CHAIM KATZ, and

INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS

AND JEWS ("IFCJ"),

Defendants

Plaintiff for the complaint, allege and set forth as follows:

X

INTRODUCTION

FILED

NOV 1 6 2015

carmelitm^d'er shinn, clerk

U.S. DIST. Ci^(j^WESTERN

1. Plaintiffs two daughters had been snatched from her and placed in facilities, operated by

Defendants WIZO and SOS. This civil action arises out of false solicitations of funds

from American donors to propel a booming industry of child trafficking, outplacements

and snatching of children from natural parents and their placements in facilities operated

by facilities owned by WIZO and SOS. The funds collected in the US appear to be

intended to propel a massive campaign

of child snatching, currently in operation in Israel,

so that all involved except the parents and the children enrich themselves immensely.

2. The Plaintiff brings this action under the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of

1934; as well as Federal Common Laws against the front operations in the United States

that falsely solicit, finance, and provided material support for the Israeli agents who carried

out kidnappings; torture; assault and battery, and sexual abuse on children removed from

natural custody and falsely imprisoned under the custody of defendants. In the process.

Defendants commit fraud upon American donors.

.ITTRTSDTCTION AND VENUE

3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt

Practices Act(FCPA), Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Act (15

U.S.C. §77q(a)) and Section 10(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §

78j(b)) and Rule lOb-5 thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5) which authorizes action inany

appropriate District Court. Subject matter jurisdiction is also conferred by 28 USC § 1331

and 1332.

4. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 USC § 1391 and 18 USC §2334. See Section

27 ofthe Exchange Act.

5. Defendant Schusterman is subject to thejurisdiction of this Court under 18 USC § 2334

because she is an Oklahoma resident. Defendant Shusterman is indeed the mastermind of

policies of child snatching perpetrated in Israel by all other Defendants, as she has setup a

web ofentities in Israel, which dictate to the Ministry of Welfare and to Judges in Juvenile

Coiurts, where children are snatched the policies and methods which deprive the parents

any real ability to fight to keep the children at home. Schusterman is theperson who

controls the Israeli welfare system and eventhe Minister of Welfare defendant Chaim Katz

is a puppet dancing to the tunes ofher music.

6. As too all other Defendants, aggregate jurisdiction is applicable under 18 USC § 2334, as

Oklahomais where all decisions and policies

ofthe Israeli welfare system and methods are

made.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 28

7. Defendants, who are officials ofthe State ofIsrael, such as Itzhak Amit, a Supreme Court

Judge, TovaPeri, Ajudge in Juvenile Courts, Galit Mor Vigotzki, President of the Juvenile

Courts, and Chaim Katz, Minister ofWelfare are subject to suit in the courts ofthe United

States pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602 et seq.,

because their conduct falls within the exceptions to foreign sovereign immunity set forth in

28 U.S.C. §§ 1605(a)(5) and 1605(a), and in particular there are trained and receive orders

for operation from Schusterman or her agents in Oklahoma or Israel.

8. In addition Plaintiffs also invoke

the supplemental jurisdiction ofthis Court, 28 U.S.C. §§

1367, over claims based upon laws ofthe State ofOklahoma.

9. The amount in controversy, both individually and collectively, exceeds one million U.S.

Dollars.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 28

10. Defendant WIZO, SOS and the Fellowship ofChristians and Jews (ofRabbi Yechiel

Eckstein) solicit funds in this District. Therefore, it satisfies "minimum contacts" test

insofar as litigating in this District.

11. All Defendants are aggregated as co-wrongdoersand as such, it is necessary for

Defendants' disposition ofjustice in association with local co-Defendants.

PARTIES

12. PlaintiffMarigold Collins is a British citizen and resident of Israel. She is a single mother

oftwo daughters Becky Collins and Sylvia Collins.

13. Becky Collins and Sylvia Collins are the daughters ofMarigold Collins and citizens of

Israel and the United Kingdom.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 4 of 28

14. Plaintiff Marigold Collins is the biological mother of twins, Becky Rose and Sylvia Marie

(both 10 years old),

Who were first locked up in one ofthe facilities ofDefendant Anat

Ben Hur Rokah at Wizo Hadassim emergency shelter 14 months by Defendant WIZO and

later transferred to a facility belonging to Defendant SOS.

15. Defendant LYNN SCHUSTERMAN operates a foundation in Oklahoma, the Charles and

Lynn Shusterman Foundation which is a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the

State

ofOklahoma and whose headquarters is in Tulsa, OK.

16. Schusterman purports to operate "a global organization that seeks to ignite the passion and

unleash the power in young people to create positive change for themselves, the Jewish

community and the broader world." In fact, Schusterman is a believer ofNazi style

ideology that children are better

off growing up in facilities supervised by the state, rather

than with biological parents, and that children do not need biological parents in order to

grow up. This is the motto and policy that Schusterman is forcing the recipients

ofher

funds to accept.

17. Upon information and belief, Schusterman is also engaged in laundering money to

terrorize normal Israeli families. Defendant Schusterman funds the implementation

of

policies that are well-documented to be the most corrupt government in the OECD.

(http://www.ipost.eom/National-News/Peres-State-Comptroller-must-protect-individual-

rights-319480\

18. Defendant Schusterman's funding has caused child poverty in Israel to be the worst in the

OECD (http://www.jpost.com/Breal<ing-News/OECD-report-rates-child-poverty-in-lsrael-

among-highest).

19. What is more. Defendant Schusterman has caused a sharp increase in child abuse from its

4

beginning during a period when child abuse in the United States dropped significantly

(http://www.jpost.eom/National-News/Child-abuse-rates-in-lsrael-now-higher-than-in-

US).

20. Israeli children in general and Plaintiffs in particular would not be harmed ifDefendant

Schusterman would not illegally fund State terrorism via use ofsocial workers and Judges

who heed to the Schusterman legacy upon innocent Israelis, such as the Plaintiff and her

daughters.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 5 of 28

21. In addition, Schusterman is also a major decision maker in the JEWISH FEDERATION

OF TULSA (JFT) of2021 East 71st Street Tulsa, OK 74136-5411 (918) 495-1100, which

is a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State ofOklahoma and whose

headquarters is in Tulsa, OK. JFT purports to be, "ensuring a vibrant Jewish future", and

sends moneyto Israel so that social workers can kidnap children from parents and send

them into facilities, foster care ofadoptions with wealthy families.

22. Upon information and belief, JFT acts as the local conduit for the co-Defendants engaged

in laundering money to terrorize normal Israeli families. Schusterman via JFT funds the

implementation ofpolicies that are well-documented to be the most corrupt government in

the OECDand maintains a Jewish Federation office in Jerusalem to closely monitor that

coercion upon the civilian population is being carried out.

23. Another vehicle employed by Schusterman is the PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND

(PEF), a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State ofNew York and whose

headquarters is in New YorkCity. PEF purports to "provide a means for individuals,

foundations and charitable institutions to recommend grants to approved Israeli charities at

no expense to the donor." However, upon information and belief, PEF is a repeat offender

coordinating with Defendant Schusterman to engage in raising and laundering money to

terrorize normal Israeli families. PEF is specifically responsible for funding "Shiluv

Institute" for Family & Couple Therapy (an institute controlled by Schusterman who

dictates policy to the Israeli ministry

ofWelfare), and also WIZO to kidnap children from

loving parents.

24. Another vehicle employed by Schusterman to coerce Israeli welfare officials to accept her

child snatching ideology is the SHILUV INSTITUTE FOR FAMILYAND COUPLES

THERAPY (SHILUV); 6 HaLevanon Street, Jerusalem, ISRAEL 91062. Shiluv is

publicly and privately funded by Schusterman to implement discriminatory policies of

torture and kidnapping. Shiluv acts under authority and/or color ofIsraeli law to torture

parents and kidnap their children using funds raised from this district by PEF and/or

Schusterman. Upon information and belief, Shiluv has transacted business within the state

and/or committed tortuous acts described hereinwithin the state itself and/orthrough an

agent.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 6 of 28

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 7 of 28

25. Defendant WIZO is a corporation with address at 950 Third Ave, New York, NY 10022,

Phone: 212-751-6461, Fax :212-751-6818, c/o Vicki Sakhai, Chair.

26. WIZO solicits donations in the United States, including this District specifically, allegedly

for the welfare of Israeli families and children. In reality, it operates prison-style facilities

for children in Israel, lock-down facilities such as "WIZO Hadasim", which serve as

locked facilities for children who are removed fi-om normative parents to fill up capacities

in such placement facilities. These children are locked in prison-like conditions against

their will, even when they have no criminalrecords nor are they a threat to themselves or

others. WIZO is also the licensee of theIsraeli Ministry of Welfare training school for

government social workers, where they are trained how to locate children top fill up the

facilities operated by WIZO itself. WIZO pretends to serve the interests ofthe feminist

movement, yet in reality, it is single mothers who are targeted by WIZO for the kidnapping

and trafficking in their children.

27. WIZO presents to American donors horrible pictures of hungry or beaten children and

inducesAmerican donors to believe that the donations are needed to save children from

hunger, from rolling out in the streets or from life ofabuse and molestation, when in reality

the money is used to brutally pounce on good children in the care ofgood mothers, just so

as to fill up the network of outplacement facilities which WIZO itself operates as a form of

concentration camp for children. These children who are kidnapped into WIZO facilities

are exposed to violence by staff, rape by staff, physical restraints, punishment rooms,

coerced psychological treatment to instill hatred towards the families and mothers, sexual

promiscuity and petty crimes. Plaintiff's daughters were placed initially at the WIZO-

HADASIM facility in Israel.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 8 of 28

28. Defendant SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE- USA,Inc., is a corporation locatedat

1620 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20006. It is a is a

501(c)3 nonprofit organization with EIN Tax ID# 13-6188433. - See more at:

http://www.sos-usa.Org/#sthash.iX43Jfvf.dpuf.

29. SOS Children's villages purports to assist children without homes, refugee children and

children roaming the streets in places such as Syria, Afghanistan, Nepal, where the

Governmentcannot afford to provide for its own children. In Israel however, SOS

operates two children villages that charge the State ofIsrael the sum of 17,000 Shekels

($4,500) per month per child. In Plaintiff's case, SOS charges the State of Israel the sum

of 34,000 Shekels ($9,000) per month to accommodate Becky and Sylvia in an SOS

facility. Thus, funds collected in the USA and sent to Israel are certainly not going to save

children, but rather to the inflated salaries ofthe Israeli SOS branches.

30. SOS runs concentration camps for children. These children who are kidnapped into SOS

facilities are exposed to violence by staff, rape by staff, physical restraints, punishment

rooms, coerced psychological treatment to instill hatred towards the families and mothers,

sexual promiscuity and petty crimes. Plaintiffs daughters were placed at SOS facility in

Israel, after placement at WIZO.

31. Defendant Judge Itshak Amit, has an address at Bet Mishpat Elyon, 1 Kiryat Hamemshala,

Jerusalem Israel. Amit is a Supreme Court Judge who handled the appeal

ofPlaintiff on

the removal ofher daughters from custody. Judge Amit made a ruling with precedential

effect stating that in Juvenile Courts where a social worker brings a petition to remove

children into a welfare facility, the parent (in this case Plaintiff) has no right to cross

examine the social worker, has no right to call witnesses and the legal process is stripped

ofany sense ofadversarial litigation since the social worker's decision cannot be

challenged. Thus in effect Judge Amit turned the Israeli juvenile courts into rubber stamps

of the social workers, and the entire judical process ofremoving a child to a facility is a

mere formality where a Judge "so orders" automatically everythingthat a social worker

tells him to do.

32. Defendant Amit disregarded and ignored human rights and children's rights by

international law by knowingly and repeatedly allowing the other Israeli co-Defendants to

traffic children.

33. Defendant Tova Peri is a Judge in the Juvenile Court ofTelAviv with an address at 12

Kadesh Barnea St, Maoz aviv Tel Aviv Israel. Judge Peri conducted the so called hearing

where initially social workers sought rubber stamping of their decision to remove the two

daughters from Plaintiffon the grounds that the daughters needto be "evaluated" outside

the home away from the mothers. Judge Peri did not allow the mother to cross examine

the social worker or to bring witnesses and directed that the daughters be placed in the care

ofWIZO.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 9 of 28

34. Defendant Peri disregarded and ignored human rights and children's rights by international

law by knowingly and repeatedly allowing the other Israeli co-Defendants to traffic

children.

35. Defendant Galit Mor Vigotzki is the President ofall Juvenile Courts in Israel with an

address at 6 Vilenski St, TelAviv 66532 Israel. Mor Vigotzki appears in training sessions

for lawyers and Judges where she tells the audience proudly that the Juvenile Courts under

her direction will not allow any mother or father to question a social worker decision to

snatch a child from parental custody. Judge Mor Vigotzki directed that Plaintiff's

daughters be placed in an SOS facility.

36. Defendant Mor Vigotzki disregarded and ignored human rights and children's rights by

international law by knowingly and repeatedly allowing the other Israeli co-Defendants to

traffic children.

37. Defendant Chaim Katz is the Minister of Welfare in Israel and is in charge of all social

workers and children villages and facilities. Katz address is at 20 Sagi street City of

Shoham, Israel. Katz has privatized the policymaking and decision making of his welfare

officers to the various institutions which Schusterman controls (including the Charuv

Institute and the Rashi Foundation), and by doping so he has integrated theNazi-style

eugenics influenced theories of Shusterman into daily life in the Israeli social system.

Katz has also signed the various orders to compensate children's facilities at $4,500 per

child per month, with zero financial assistance to the mothers whose children are taken

away.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 10 of 28

38. Katz disregarded and ignored human rights and children's rights by international law by

10

knowingly and repeatedly allowing the other Israeli co-Defendants to traffic children.

39. Defendant INTERNATIONALFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS ("IFCJ") is

located at 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4300, Chicago, IL 60602, tel: (800) 486-8844,

fax: (312) 641-7201, EjN: 36-3256096.

40. IFCJ is run by a Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein who solicits evangelical Americans to donate

money, allegedly for children in Israel, when in fact these moneys are spent by Eckestein

to assist the Welfare Authorities ofIsrael to build more facilities so that more children can

be kidnapped from their parents, andto promote Eckestein's ownpersonal andpolitical

aspirations.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 11 of 28

Background

41. The source of evils originates inthe District of Oklahoma where Defendant Lynn

Schusterman, a billionaire and founder ofthe Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family

Foundation, uses her wealth and power to spearhead defrauding American donors outof

billions to fund imposing welfare policies inIsrael that encourage kidnapping thousands of

innocent Israeli children from their lovingparents.

42. Schusterman's policies have led to a child welfare crisis in Israel where 10,000 children

were taken from their families last year and 70% of those were placed in institutions where

physical and sexual abuse uponthose children abound ( http://www.ipost.com/Breaking-

News/Emergencv-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-abuse-at-childrens-homes405^?fb_action_ids=l0205668123733821

HYPERLINK

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids= 10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

n

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 12 of 28

r_multiline&action_obj ect_map=%5B389971651127423%5D«&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"& HYPERLINK

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids= 10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"fb_action_types=og.shares

HYPERLINK "http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-calIed-after-

report-exposes-abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids= 10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"& HYPERLINK

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids=10205668123733821&fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"fb_source=other_multiline

HYPERLINK "http;//www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-

report-exposes-abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids=10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"& HYPERLINK

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids=10205668123733821&fb_action_types-^og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline«feaction_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"action_object_map=%5B389971651127

423%5D HYPERLINK "http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-

called-after-report-exposes-abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids=10205668123733821&fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D«&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"& HYPERLINK

12

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids= 10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"action_type_map=%5B%22og.shares%

22%5D HYPERLINK "http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-

after-report-exposes-abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids=10205668123733 821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"& HYPERLINK

"http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Emergency-meeting-called-after-report-exposes-

abuse-at-childrens-homes-

405618?fb_action_ids= 10205668123733821 &fb_action_types=og.shares&fb_source=othe

r_multiline&action_object_map=%5B389971651127423%5D&action_type_map=%5B%2

2og.shares%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D"action_ref_map=%5B%5D).

43. Defendant Schusterman, and her instruments PEF, and JFT act as conduits for private

donations largely from the Jewish community mislead the unsuspecting private donors into

thinking they are helping improve the lives ofIsraeli children when, in fact, they terrorize

these children and their families.

44. Defendant IFCJ coordinates with the other Defendants as the conduit for private donations

largely from the Evangelical Christian community. Like Defendants Schusterman, PEF,

and JFT, they mislead the unsuspecting private donors into thinking they are helping

improve the lives ofIsraeli children when, in fact, they terrorize these children and their

families.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 13 of 28

45. Over $3 billion in private donations from North America are sent to Israel every year to

coerce the civilian population into total submission of their children to thechild facilities

operators such as WIZO, SOS, and inthe case ofreligious children "EMUNA". This is

amount alone is $1 billion more than the Oklahoma Department ofHuman Services. Add

13

to these donations the sum of8.5 billion shekels from the state budget plus over 1 billion

shekels from other sources - the Defendants have created a very lucrative nulti-billion

annual industry

ofkidnapping Israeli children that originates in this District.

46. Defendants WIZO, SOS and Shiluv act as policy enforcers for the co-Defendants. They

act under color oflaw to kidnap thousands ofIsraeli children from loving parents using

funds illegally raised by Defendants Schusterman, PEF, JFT, and IFCJ.

47. To give the appearance ofacting under law, they convene committees that bribe

disgraced "experts" to make up bogus "diagnoses" that do not actually exist.

48. Underpretense of law they steer these committee recommendations to specific

judges whowill rubber-stamp whatever Defendants WIZO, SOSofShiluvbring to

them.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 14 of 28

49. Defendants lie under oath in court hearings, when they know that there is absolutely no

waythey will get caught since there is no real court hearings in Israeli Juvenile Courts, and

there is no disciplinary action against corrupted social workers.

50. Even when they get caught lying under oath, they enjoy immunity in the courtrooms of the

co-Defendant judges who are actually co-conspirators acting under color of law

themselves.

51. The Defendants, Judge Itshak Amit, Judge Galit Mor Vigotski, Judge Tova Peri, and

others like them such as the infamous Judge Philip Marcus (retired for homophobic

speeches) all have disregarded and ignored human rights and children's rights by

international law by knowingly and repeatedly allowing the other Israeli co-Defendants to

traffic children under color oflaw.

14

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 15 of 28

52. Schusterman has now hired former Judge Philip Marcus to currently serve as a spokesman

for the Haruv Institute (which she controls), and jurist for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign

Affairs. Heis notorious from his philosophy that parents are not entitled to any human

rights inthe courtroom. Schusterman pays him to speak at conferences for judges

internationally trying to convince the global community to abolish parental human rights

the same way the Defendants have done in Israel. Marcus praises the "professionalism" of

the Defendants who kidnap children under color of law and false testimonies while making

the bogus claim that the United States, including this District, does not employ social

workers or other child welfare professionals to protect at-riskchildren.

(http://cdnapi.kaltura.eom/index.php/extwidget/openGraph/wid/l uc[pg9x69V

53. Although the Plaintiff is a single mother, and in her case there was no need to tarnish the

father in order to remove Becky and Sylvia, in cases where there are known fathers to

children candidates for kidnapping, it is the policy of Schusterman and all defendants

involved to invent and create false allegations ofpedophilia against the father, so as to

allow easy kidnapping.

15

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 16 of 28

54. Judge Marcus, for example, was one ofthe prominent implementers of the false pedophilia

accusations, who routinely treated every man who appeared in his case as a sexual

molester against children, knowing that this is a one way ticket for thechildren to be sent

to a security facility as WIZO or SOS.

55. Marcus was forced into early retirement only after making a baseless allegation against a

gay father that he might be a pedophile or sexual molester. If that accusation was not

made against a gay father, most likely Marcus would still besitting onthe bench today.

56. The following videos showthe situation in Israel regarding state-sponsored trafficking of

children from loving parents and into Defendants' facilities; Formerjudge HannaBenAmi

in a conference on this issue stated, "social workers steal documents for trafficking in

children," https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=Wm5CZ9NlM3o.

57. Former Knesset Member Dr. Marina Solodkin, with Knesset Member Nissim Zeev in a

committee meeting on the subject oftoo many children are being taken out of their normal

home "trafficked by the welfare into the care of such as WIZO Hadassim emergency

shelter via Anat Ben Hur Rokah Wizo Hadassa Canada and Wizo international,

https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=UPIzrWiTP60 .

58. A radio show with Prof Slonim Nevo did research for more than 20 years on thousands of

children that had been removed from home . She found out with the proper service in the

community that they would not have been trafficked into the emergency shelters and

boarding schools by the # 15% they really had saved. So with 85% they did emotional and

physical damage to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BW-bPSrKkMU.

59. Knesset member Nissim Zeev on the crimes ofthe welfare his quote "run from the

welfare like from fire" https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=C8-UND QhUY .

16

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 17 of 28

60. See also a TV investigative report from 2015 by Channel 1 on the issue ofsexual assault

upon children in foster homes that happen; the welfare get 1400 exemption committee

permission not to inform the police and as such thousands

ofcomplaints ofchildren in

there care go uninvestigated and as ifthe trauma is not enough they don't get treatment

which is a violation ofchild humans rights http://mothers-

crv.eom/2015/03/28/%D7%AA%D7%97%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%99%D7%A4%D7

%A2%D7%AA HYPERLINK "http://mothers-cry.eom/2015/03/28/-l-n"i5;-p^'7-Vn57D^-l^pnn

-'757-mt27p-m-'ny

nn/"-%D7%92%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A7-%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A5-l-

HYPERLINK"http://mothers-cry.com/2015/03/28/-'757-mtt'p-nvn57-l-rn57-p^'7>nx7D^-n^pnn

nn/"%D7%A2%D7%93%D7%95%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A7%D7%A9%D7%95%D7

%AA-%D7%A2%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%AA/ .

61. See also an interview with a mother who asked for financial help for the kindergarten and

instead they took her child for 3 years https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=hbgb i9xr98 .

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Kidnapping ofBecky Collins and Sylvia Coilins

62. Becky Rose and Sylvia Marie Collins are twin sisters who were bom on March 14, 2005 in

Israel, to Marigold Collins, currently age 46 and is a resident

ofIsrael.

63. On or about Plaintiff Marigold asked for some help from a government social

worker Vicky Heine and Lotte Wiener, since Plaintiff is undoubtedly poor.

64. The social worker elicited information from Plaintiff about her financial hardship and

breached their confidence by using the information to declare the girls "at risk". The ruse

for the kidnapping was that the daughters may have a PDD disorder and need to be

17

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 18 of 28

diagnosed in a shelter away from home.

65. Instead of providing the help, the social workers Heine andLotte decided to kidnap the

two

girls into a children village operated by Defendant WIZO without any basis in law or

in fact. WIZO describes its operations in Israel in its web site "Home for girls in WIZO

Hadassim" (4/6/2008).

66. Defendant Tova conducted a hearing without hearing any evidence or allowing cross

examination and rubber stamped the demand ofthe social workers that the daughters be

removed. The same happened at the District Court and at the Supreme Court in a decision

ofJustice Yitzhak Amit. This ruling endorsed the kidnapping oftwo girls using funds

illegitimately raised in the United States, including this District.

COUNT 1

Common Law - Detention by WIZO

67. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege all facts and circumstances described above as if fully set

forth as truth herein.

68. On or about November 8, 2011 agents ofDefendant Chaim Katz, social workers Vicki

Heine and Lota Wilner petitioned the Israeli Juvenile Court to remove Becky and Sylvia

from the custody ofPlaintiff on the ground that the daughters need "diagnosis" in an

emergency shelter and declared them as "at risk" children, which means that custody is

transferred to the agents

ofChaim Katz.

69. On that day Judge Tova Peri granted the application without the ability to question the

18

social workers or conduct a trial.

70. On July 10, 2012 Defendant Judge Tova Peri extended the at risk declaration without trial

by another year to July 10, 2013.

71. OnMay8, 2013 Katz' social workers petitioned Defendant Peti to permanently remover

the daughters from Plaintiff's custody on the ground that Plaintiff is "non cooperative".

Judge Peri ordered that the daughters betaken into an emergency shelter operated by

WIZO. Police was sent to Plaintiff's home to snatch the girls. Several hours later a stay

was issued and the girls were returned home pending appeal.

72. On June 25, 2013 at an appeal hearingthe Courtaffirmed Judge Peri's order because the

social workers lied to court that they only intend to place the children in a shelter for 3

months. (That is a common lie, because once children are removed, there is no way to

remrn them, and applications to extend the 3 months are routinely granted, many times ex

parte.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 19 of 28

73. On June 25, 2013 police was sent to take the girls and the girls were placed in a WIZO

emergency shelter with no rights ofvisits at home, supervised visitations once a month for

30 minutes in a secured facility with 6 guards, and no telephone contact and no release of

any medical or other information as to what WIZO is doing to the girls.

74. On July 2, 2013 a hearing was conducted at the Supreme Court before Judge Amit in the

matter ofBAAM4746/13 Collins v. Social Services ofTel Aviv.

19

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 20 of 28

75. On July 4,2013 Defendant Judge Amit issued a decision stating that a parent has no right

to challenge a social worker in cross examination or bring witnesses because in Israel,

according to a new ruling he just invented, a social worker is an extension ofthe judiciary

and therefore immune from challenges and cross examination even though the social

worker is the initiating party ofthe lawsuit. This ruling shows how the industry of

trafficking with children in Israel is so ingrained to the system, that Judges are willing to

dispense with all forms ofhuman rights/Due Process and litigants' rights, just to achieve

their goal

offilling up facilities with children, and supplying children to companies that

place children with foster families.

76. Judge Amit even condemned the Plaintiff for not being cooperative with social services

and not voluntarily surrendering her childrento the social workers who want to rip her

apart

from the fruits ofher womb. Sadly, the same could have been said by the Nazis in

the

Warsaw Ghettos to Jewish motherswho refused to cooperate with filling up quotas to

fill up the trains to Auschwitz.

77. Defendant WIZO has illegally obtained custody of the daughters of Plaintiff, illegally

caused the alienation of the daughters of Plaintiff from her, illegally exposed the daughters

to discipline, punishment rooms, forcefully andneedlessly administered to the girls

psycho-tropic drugs Optil and Respidal, inflicted upon them violence by staff, including

sexual molestation, and severe distress.

78. For the first 5 months after the kidnapping authorized by JudgeAmit, there wereno visits

with the girls. Thereafter two short visits were allowed, with 6 guards watching. During

the second visit one of the girls sneaked to the mother a picture of a girl with a red

bleeding vagina. When Plaintiff wanted to take the girls to an emergency unit to check for

signs of rape, all contact with the girls was suspended for another 5 months. Visits were

resumed only on September 11, 2014 at the "contact center" supervised facility at the

King George station in Tel Aviv for 1 hour.

20

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 21 of 28

79. On Sept 17, 2014 Plaintiffand friends made a demonstration in front ofthe Minister of

Justice, in East Jerusalem, Ms. Tzipi Livni, for 10hours. The day after Judge Peri recused

herself from the case on September 18, 2014.

80. Defendant WIZO knowingly, maliciously and illegally incarcerated the daughters of

Plaintiffs thereby causing illegal detention of a human being for a period beginning June

25, 2015 and until July 9, 2014.

81. The co-Defendants except SOS each in his own way contributed and/or aided and abetted

the illegal detainer ofthe daughters and are therefore co-liable.

82. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover from the defendants except SOS the sum of

$2,000,000.

COUNT2

Common Law - Detention bv SOS

83. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege all facts and circumstances described above as if fully set

forth as truth herein.

84. On orabout July 9, 2014 the daughters ofPlaintiff were transferred to a facility called

Megadim, owned and operated by Defendant SOS.

85. Defendant SOS knowingly, maliciously and illegally incarcerated the daughters of

Plaintiffs thereby causing illegal detention ofa human being for a period beginning July 9,

2014 until today.

86. Defendant SOS has illegally obtained custody ofthe daughters ofPlaintiff, illegally caused

21

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 22 of 28

the ahenation ofthe daughters ofPlaintiff from her, illegally exposed the daughters to

discipline, punishment rooms, forcefully and needlessly administered to the girls psycho-

tropic drugs Optil and Respidal, inflicted upon them violence by staff, including

sexual ,molestation, and severe distress.

87. At the SOS facility the daughters were separated and were not allowed to see each other

only on weekends, holidays, and 1 hour a day on week. A gross act ofcruelty to separate

twins already suffering.

88. The co-Defendants, except WIZO each in his own way contributed and/or aided and

abetted the illegal detainer ofthe daughters and are therefore co-liable.

89. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover from the defendants except WIZO the sum of

$2,000,000.

COUNT 3

Common Law - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - WIZO

90. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege all facts and circumstances described above as if fully set

forth as truth herein.

91. While the daughters were in the possession ofWIZO they were subjected to mental

interruption seeking to instil in them hatred towards their mother and encouraged the

daughters by mental coercion to avoid contact with the mother, her mother and their uncle.

92. The Defendant WIZO has applied mental pressure on the children in order to brand them

as "at risk children" so that WIZO can keep holding the daughters in the facility and

22

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 23 of 28

charge the budgets controlled by Defendant Katz $9,000 per month.

93. Defendant WIZO acted maliciously and knowingly to alienate the daughters ofPlaintiff

from her and cause

her and the daughters loss offilial emotions and grief and agony.

94. Moreover, to intensify

the alienation ofPlaintifffrom her daughters WIZO agents have

filed false police reports against the Plaintiff. This is a well-known tactic advocated by the

institutes

ofSchusterman in their training ofthe various professionals handling removal of

children from home, and also supported Judges such as Amit, Pei and Mor Vigigotzki as

part ofthe tricks ofthe trade oftrafficking with children.

95. All co-defendants except SOS have contributed and/or aided and abetted the infliction of

emotional distress in their own ways.

96. Plaintiffis therefore entitled to recover from the defendants except SOS the sumof

$2,000,000.

COUNT 4

Common Law - Intentional Infliction ofEmotional Distress - SOS

97. Plaintiffs repeat andreallege all facts and circumstances described above as if fully set

forth as truth herein.

98. While the daughters were in the possession of SOS they were subjected to mental

interruption seeking to instill in the daughters hatred towards their mother, revulsion of

their mother, and encouraged the daughters by mental coercion to avoid contact with the

mother, her mother and their uncle.

23

99. The Defendant SOS has applied mental pressure on the children in order to brand them as

"at risk children" so that WIZO can keep holding the daughters in the facility and charge

the enormous budgets controlled by Defendant Katz $9,000 per month.

100. Defendant WIZO acted maliciously and knowingly to alienate the daughters of

Plaintiff from her and cause her and the daughters loss of filial emotions and griefand

agony.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 24 of 28

101. Moreover, to intensify the alienation ofPlaintiff from her daughters WIZO agents

have filed false police reports against the Plaintiff. This is a well-known tactic advocated

by the institutes of Shusterman in their training of the various professionals handling

removal ofchildren from home, and also supported ny Judges such as Amit, Pei and Mor

Vigotzki as part ofthe tricks ofthe trade oftrafficking with children.

102. All co-defendants except WIZO have contributed and/or aided and abetted the

infliction ofemotional distress in their own ways.

103. Plaintiffis therefore entitled to recover from the defendants except WIZO the sum

of$2,000,000.

COUNT 5

False Solicitations

104. Schusterman, WIZO, SOS and IFCJ created a network ofwebsites to collect funds

within the USA andCanada. Indeed, in the past 7 years Wizo collected a average of

$3,500,000 each year in donations for a total of30,000,000 collected from the Jewish

community for the purpose ofchildren and families in Israel.

24

105. The calls for donations in the United States promise that the monies will serve Jewish

families in Israel, strengthening ofthe Jewish families and a better future for the children

in Israel. The donors are not told that the monies collected in the US go mainly to the

inflated salaries ofthe two Schusterman branches in Israel (Charuv and Keren Rashi), the

shelters operated by SOS and in the case

ofIFCJ for photo-ops ofYechiel Eckestein, who

occasionlly donates 20 books worth $5 each to 20 children, and advertises himself as if he

brought salvation to all the 2 million children in Israel with schoolbooks for the remainder

oftheir school lives.

106. The donors in the USA are also not told that poor parents in Israel are offered zero

financial assistance, and once a poor child is identified, the social workers working for

Katz pounce on him and bring him into the Juvenile Courts

ofPeri and Mor Vigotski for

an immediate launch into a facility where they will be candidates for adoption, foster or

permanent outplacement in shelters that charge Katz no less than $4,500 per child per

month.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 25 of 28

107. Some examples of Defendants' falsehoods are texts like this: "we demonstrate

awareness and commitmentby translating services with cultural sensitivity so we can help

all ofIsrael's children, firom native Israelis to immigrants from The Former Soviet Union,

Ethiopia and the Far East, from Ultra Orthodox children to those that live on Kibbutzim,

regardless oftheir religion, ethnicity, or social strata".

108. Usually these false solicitations contain exaggerated numbers ofchildren,

exaggerated numbers oftreatments or shelters, exaggerated description ofthe phenomenon

of at risk children in Isarael, when all this is intended to gain influence with the Ministry of

Welfare, extract charges from the Ministry ofWelfare (In Schusterman's case she received

from the ministry ofWelfare more money than she brings inof so called philanthropical

money, but in exchange she gets the privilege of dictating to the Israeli Ministry of Welfare

25

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 26 of 28

policies andmethods ofoperation. Eckestein from IFCG is simply looking for pictures

with children in Israel to portray them as poor homeless kids to the evangelical

worshippers whose money he falsely milks.

109. The donations all these defendants seek in the US are channeled to morally shocking,

repugnant and horrendous activites ofimprisonment ofchildren against their parents will,

alienation ofchildren from their parents ^subjecting children to regime ofterror and

Dickensian discipline in facilities operated by defendant administering drugs to children

physically restraining using "holding " that is a traumatizing act of force to the children

and that is disciplining them physically, exploiting the poverty ofthe children's parents to

supply children to the staff of defendants.

110. In general, and this is common to all predicate acts offund solicitations. Defendants

use mail and wires to correspond with donors, give speeches in the Jewish Communities

urging the Jews to open wallets in philanthropy. For each visit on these philanthropical

tours they tailor a special story. For example if a US community has a sister state in Israel,

they say that Wizo, SOS or IFCJ need to expand to that town.

111. Usually, they pass offan already existing child treatment center, which is paid for

and run by the Government ofIsrael, as if it was a "satellite" WIZO, SOS or IFCJ.

112. Otherwise, WIZO, SOS or IFCJ invent bogus stories about renovations in shelters

that never happen.

113. Upon information and belief, Wizo hides from the Jewish donors the truth that there

26

are 12,000 children in emergency shelters and 75000 in boarding schools - this is 6 times

more than the rest ofthe world in outplacement facilities, simply because facilities need to

be filled up and operators need to draw enormous salaries.

114. In general, each approach to a Jewish federation embellishes on false or misleading

statistics, such as "WIZO treats children in a metropolitan area of 1.5 Million inhabitants

(and compare: only 15 children are housed at the shelter). Other false or embellished

"statistics are "WIZO therapists treated 3,540 abused children and their family

members". (Here again, it is Government therapist paid by the Government who "treat"

the children, not Wizo).

115. In order to bamboozle the audience, she says things like: "Seventy percent ofthe

cases in therapy are those ofsexual abuse" while only 41% ofthe calls to the hotline

referred to sexual abuse. This is due to the fact that whenever sex crimes occur, there is

more sensitivity and pressure to seek assistance than in cases ofphysical abuse (as a result,

more physical abuse victims go untreated)". In reality, the audience does not know what

that treatment is. It is coercive tactics to find children and elicit information that their

parents are "abusing" them in order to take them into the shelters and from then on into

foster care and adoptions.

116. Such practices constitute fraud in violation ofthe U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

(FCPA), as donations to these organizations can be used to buy influence - for example, by

fuimelling funds or donating to an officials' favourite charity or cause.

117. By reason ofthe foregoing, Defendants violated Sections 13(b)(Z)(A) and

13(B)(2)(B) ofthe Exchange Act.

RELIEF REQUESTED

Wherefore, Plaintiff demands Judgment for compensation against Defendants in the sum of

$2,000,000.

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 27 of 28

27

Case 5:15-cv-01265-M Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 28 of 28

Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury.

Dated: October 31,2015

JURY DEMAND

Signe'H^ /^//^M5^^6rd~(!!ollins

3 Lilinblum Street

28

Tel Aviv Israel

#Israel, #Child Trafficking, #Wizo, #Lynn Schusterman, #Welfare, #Child Abuse, #Funding, #Judges, #Injustice, #Human rights

0
2
0

Bill Fuentes

2 years ago

This so-called "lawsuit" would never get past the Filing Clerk! That's why there is no Filing nor attorneys appearing for either "Party" and your publishing such meaningless prattle taints Byline and its community of journalists that it could cost them in lost income!

Marianne Azizi

2 years ago

Hello Bill. The lawsuit was filed, and served to all parties in Israel last month. It is indeed a shocking case. Photos were taken of various 'serving' of parties, and all other servings by registered mail were received. The story was also posted in Israel.

Bill Fuentes

2 years ago

This so-called "lawsuit" would never get past the Filing Clerk! That's why there is no Filing nor attorneys appearing for either "Party" and your publishing such meaningless prattle taints Byline and its community of journalists that it could cost them in lost income!

Marianne Azizi

2 years ago

I certainly don't want to taint Byline. The lawsuit did indeed pass the filing clerk, and on my fb page there are videos of a couple of the servings. The ongoing correspondence is likely to be through the Hague Convention, and I will update on it's progress. It is indeed shocking that many Israelis are taking such actions, and it needs to be reported. The lawsuit today, I shared directly from an Israeli post. This would not be issued in the press at this point, so it is hard to find normally. Thank you for your feedback.